OnlyFans expert at Dude Hack. I look after the creator directory and write the pages around it.
Ordering on this site is handled by software, refreshed daily, and weighted toward recent activity above anything else. I neither built that system nor overrule it on individual positions.
What I do is the part software cannot: review profiles by hand, pull pages off collections where they do not belong, and write the guidance that sits around each list. The methodology page sets out where the line falls.
Why this directory exists
Steve started Dude Hack in 2017 because he was tired of paying for nothing on dating apps. I came at it from the other side of the same problem.
Every OnlyFans list I found online was the same twenty names copied between sites. No prices. No dates. No sign that anyone had opened the pages they were ranking. Some listed creators who had stopped posting years earlier, and a few listed people who did not appear to exist at all.
Automated scoring fixes most of that, because a crawler notices a dead page and a human copying a list does not. What it cannot fix is the rest: whether a tag still describes a page, whether a bio matches the archive, whether a listing is framed in a way that has no business being on the site. That part needs somebody looking.
What I actually work on
Three things, most weeks.
Reviewing listings. Not all 326,000 of them — nobody could, and anyone claiming otherwise is describing a job that does not exist. I work through collections in rotation and look closely at anything the scoring cannot judge: category fit, whether the archive matches the description, and framing. Where a page does not belong on a list, I take it off regardless of what it scores.
Handling what comes in. Removal requests, corrections, reports of a wrong price or a dead link. These arrive at [email protected] and they are the fastest route to fixing anything here.
Writing the category pages. The guidance around each collection — what a category tends to contain, what it typically costs, what people most often get wrong about it. That is most of my output and all of it is opinion informed by looking at a lot of pages.
I write those in the first person because they contain judgements, and a judgement with nobody behind it is worth less than one you can argue with.
What I do not do
I do not review creators as a subscriber sharing impressions. That is Steve’s territory and he is better at it. Where a page on this site reads like personal experience with a specific creator, his name is on it.
I do not sell placement. Nothing here has ever been bought — not an entry, not a position — and should that ever change, it gets written on this page first.
I do not nudge positions by hand. Pulling a listing off a collection is within my remit; promoting one up the order is not. Those two powers are kept apart on purpose.
And I do not report figures I cannot support. Where a page claims something about itself that I cannot verify, I say the claim is unverified rather than repeating it as fact. That makes some pages duller to read. It also means the ones carrying a figure are worth something.
Corrections and removals
If a listing here is wrong, tell me and I will fix it. Wrong price, a page that has moved, a creator who has stopped posting, a profile sitting under a category that no longer fits — all of it is worth reporting and none of it offends me.
Creators who would rather not be listed can ask at [email protected]. No reason required, nothing charged, and no legal notice needed — the DMCA page explains why, and covers the formal copyright route for anyone who does need it.
Most of what keeps this directory accurate comes from people telling me what I have missed. The scoring catches dead pages on its own; it takes a person to notice that something is simply wrong.