How pages are scored, what Casey checks by hand, and what gets a profile removed.

Ranking here is automated. A scoring pass runs across the whole index every 24 hours, weighing three things: how recently a creator was active, how users behave with the listing, and how consistently the profile posts. Nothing else carries weight — not follower count, not how long an account has existed, and not money.

On top of that sits a human layer. I review profiles individually, and I can remove a page from a collection regardless of what the score says. The algorithm decides order; I decide whether a page belongs on the list at all.

On this page

• The three ranking factors
• The update cycle
• Where I override the score
• What gets a profile removed
• Removal on request
• No paid placement
• Where the numbers come from
• Age verification
• What this method does not tell you
• Reporting an error

The three ranking factors

Every profile in the index carries a composite score built from three inputs. The weighting is fixed and applies identically across every collection on the site.

Recent activity — 45%

When the creator was last confirmed active. A page posting today outranks one last seen a month ago, and the gap compounds: a profile that has gone quiet starts losing position steadily rather than dropping off a cliff.

This carries the most weight for a reason. The single most common complaint about directories in this category is dead listings — pages that still charge, still advertise daily uploads, and have not been touched since spring. Weighting activity above everything else fixes that at the source rather than by cleaning up afterwards.

User behaviour — 35%

What visitors actually do with a listing: which results they open, how long they stay, which ones they return to, which ones they skip. Those signals accumulate across the whole index and feed back into position.

The logic is that no editorial opinion beats observed behaviour. If people consistently open a page and stay, it deserves to be found. If they consistently skip past it, it does not, whatever anyone thinks of the content.

Profile freshness — 20%

How regularly a profile posts, and how recently it joined. Daily posting scores above weekly. New accounts receive a deliberate boost so that a good page opened last month can be found before it has accumulated a following.

Follower count is not an input anywhere in this. A page with fifty subscribers and a consistent posting record outranks a dormant page with fifty thousand.

The update cycle

Data collection runs continuously. Scoring runs every 24 hours against rolling windows rather than against a single day, so a burst of attention on one afternoon does not move a profile much, while a sustained pattern over weeks does.

Rankings publish across the whole index once scoring completes, and the cycle restarts immediately. There is no manual approval step between scoring and publication, which is why positions can shift between one visit and the next.

Where I override the score

The algorithm handles ordering. It does not handle judgement, and there are things it cannot see.

I review profiles individually and remove pages from collections where the score would keep them but they do not belong. The cases that come up most often:

The category does not fit. A profile tagged for a collection whose content has drifted somewhere else. The tag stays on the profile; the listing comes off the collection it no longer describes.

The bio does not match the archive. A page promising daily explicit video above an archive of stills, or advertising unlimited messaging while charging per reply. Automated scoring reads activity, not honesty.

The framing is a problem. Pages leaning on age-adjacent implication rather than describing what they actually post come off, regardless of how well they score. Every creator indexed here is an adult and verified as such; pages implying otherwise are removed on sight.

Something is wrong that a crawler cannot detect. A broken profile, a page that has changed hands, a listing that produces complaints. Anything I can see and the score cannot.

These removals are judgement calls and I make them without appeal to a rule. Where a collection is shorter than the tag would suggest, this is usually why.

What gets a profile removed

No activity for 120 days. Four months without a post, a last-seen update, or any other signal, at which point the crawl drops the profile out of every collection automatically. That is the outer limit rather than a guarantee of tenure — a page can come off sooner if I see a reason for it, and often does.

The underlying page is gone. A profile that returns a 404, redirects to a suspended-account screen, or stops responding is pulled on the next crawl.

Sustained negative signal. A listing consistently skipped or bounced from across the whole index rolls down on its own and eventually drops out.

My judgement, for any of the reasons in the section above.

The creator asks. Immediately, permanently, and without any reason being required.

Removal on request

Any creator who would rather not appear here can be taken off. It costs nothing, needs no explanation, and requires no legal notice of any kind.

Write to [email protected] and the DMCA page sets out what proof is needed and how quickly it is handled. It also covers the formal copyright process, which most people asking to be delisted turn out not to need.

Two things worth stating here rather than only there. Nobody is authorised to charge for removal from this site — anyone asking you for money to delist a profile is running a scam. And taking a listing down here changes nothing anywhere else: not on OnlyFans, not on other directories, not in a search engine that has already cached the page.

No paid placement

No creator pays to appear in a collection and no creator pays to appear higher in one. There is no arrangement under which position can be bought, and if that ever changes it will be stated on this page before it takes effect anywhere on the site.

Affiliate arrangements, where they exist, have no bearing on which profiles are indexed or where they sit. A page that fails the criteria is not listed regardless of any commercial relationship.

Where the numbers come from

Every figure quoted anywhere on this site is pulled from the index itself. Group totals, country counts, collection sizes — all of it comes from the same catalogue the scoring runs against.

Those totals carry a plus sign deliberately. The underlying count shifts by thousands inside a week as accounts are added, fall dormant or drop out on a broken link, so a rounded floor stays true while a precise number would be wrong before anybody read it.

Pricing, post dates and activity signals are read off the profiles directly. No figure here is borrowed from a rival directory, scaled from a sample, or inferred from anything other than the pages themselves.

Age verification

Every creator indexed on this site is at least 18 years old. OnlyFans verifies identity and age before any account can publish, and profiles that fail that check do not exist to be indexed.

Beyond that, pages using age-adjacent framing are removed under the human review described above, whether or not the creator is verified. If you believe a listing here involves anyone underage, write to [email protected] and it will be dealt with immediately.

What this method does not tell you

Four things worth stating plainly, because a methodology page that only lists strengths is marketing with a different heading.

It does not verify identity or location. Country and city tags reflect what a creator says about herself. Treat them as signals about language, timezone and intended audience rather than as verified addresses.

It does not measure quality. Activity, behaviour and posting frequency tell you whether a page is alive and whether people engage with it. Whether you will enjoy it is a different question this method cannot answer.

It lags reality. Scoring runs daily, but a page can change price or go quiet between passes. The checks recommended on category pages — reading post timestamps before subscribing — remain worth doing yourself.

It cannot see inside a paid page. Everything assessed here is visible from outside: the public feed, the bio, the pinned message, the profile preview. Where a judgement would require paying for access, I say the information is unavailable rather than guessing.

Reporting an error

Wrong price, dead link, a profile listed under a category that no longer fits, a page that has stopped posting — all worth reporting, and reports are how most errors here get found.

Write to [email protected]. Creators asking for changes or removal do not need to give a reason and will not be argued with.

— Casey Deakin, OnlyFans expert at Dude Hack